These are also a fraction of the performance of even the 1L PC TinyMiniMicro nodes that we look at. In terms of performance, the Intel Celeron J4125 is actually slightly faster than the Intel Atom C3558 but on most benchmarks it is ~8-11% faster so the difference is not large. Maximum power consumption was around 10W, but realistically, most of our users are going to see daily use below 10W. Hunsn 4 Port 2.5GbE I225 Intel J4125 Firewall Box Running Instead, we took the pfSense screenshots via TinyPilots. This system does not have a BMC such as an ASPEED AST2500 or AST2600, but if it did, that BMC would use about as much power. In operation, with no network cables connected, idle was around 4.5W. Hunsn 4 Port 2.5GbE I225 Intel J4125 Firewall Box Power Supply In terms of power, we had a small 12V adapter that was plenty to power this unit. The hard part is that currently, the i225 NICs are gaining support, but double-check if you are using an older OS to ensure that they have NIC support or it will be hard to download and install drivers later. Things just worked and we have used a few of these models for several weeks now, and they seem to be stable. The net impact is that we did not have to disable hardware checksum offloading, try to install new drivers or anything like that. PfSense 2.6.0 Install On Hunsn 4x 2.5GbE Network Setup With pfSense 2.6.0, this has changed and the four Intel i225-V NICs are detected and work out of the box. PfSense 2.5.2 Install On Hunsn 4x 1GbE Network Setup While these would link up, and one could pass traffic, things like DNS would throw errors and not work. With pfSense 2.5.2, the out-of-box experience was that the NICs were detected as the Intel PRO/1000 NICs. On the pfSense side, the big challenge has been Intel i225 support. PfSense Challenges and pfSense 2.6.0 to the Rescue
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |